Commentary on 1 Timothy
Do you see that complete ignorance drives a person to madness and makes him arrogant, so that whoever does not accept sound teaching is proud? And pride is to a sick soul what inflammation is to a bodily wound. So then, if he had not become proud, he would have accepted the teaching of the Lord, Who humbled Himself, washed the feet of the disciples, and said: "Learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly" (Matt. 11:29). He called blessed the "poor in spirit" (Matt. 5:3); He sent the tax collector away justified for his humility (Luke 18:13–14). Whoever does not accept this and does not know it is undoubtedly proud.
Přeložit pomocí Googlu
Commentary on 1 Timothy
The root of this error is twofold, namely, pride and lack of understanding.
In regard to the first he says, he is proud. There are two ways in which pride is said to be the root of errors: first, because the proud desire to insert themselves into matters that are not their concern; hence it is expected that they err and fall short: we have heard of the pride of Moab; he is exceedingly proud: his pride and his arrogancy, and his indignation is more than his strength (Isa 16:6). Second, because they refuse to submit their intellect to any other, but rely on their own prudence; consequently, they rebel against Sacred Scripture. Against such a person it is said: lean not upon your own prudence (Prov 3:5), and again: where humility is, there also is understanding (Prov 11:2).
The other root is weakness of intellect. Here it should be noted that just as health in the body depends on a proper balance among the humors, so truth consists in a proper balance in the intellect, because truth is a correspondence of intellect and thing. Hence just as a sick person, when he does not have a balanced condition, is affected by the slightest contrary stimulus, so too when a man's intellect is not grounded on the truth and lacks the virtue by which to judge what is true, that man falls into error in the face of any difficult question; hence he says, sick about questions: a weak man and of a short time, and falling short of the understanding of judgment and laws (Wis 9:5).
Hence Boethius says that understanding is to reasoning as a circle is to its center. For reason roves about and considers the perfections and defects and relationships of one thing to another, and unless it finally arrives at an understanding of the truth, its roaming is in vain. Hence, when it discovers the truth of a thing, it holds it as a center. But some take intellectual journeys without ever arriving: ever learning and never attaining to the knowledge of the truth (2 Tim 3:7); hence he says, sick about questions, i.e., never reaching the center.
And he says, questions and strifes of words, because in some matters doubt arises from the object itself, but in others from the words and names; hence he says, questions, in regard to the first, namely, questions about things: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith (1 Tim 1:4); in regard to the second he says, and strifes of words: he who follows after words only shall have nothing (Prov 19:7). And he says, strifes of words, meaning those cases when strife arises from words alone. For example, the Lord says: if the Son shall make you free, you shall be free indeed (John 8:36) and in Matthew: then the children are free (Matt 17:25); now if someone wished to infer from this that all Catholics, since they are sons of God, are therefore free, it would be a strife of words, because the Lord is speaking of spiritual freedom, not bodily.
Then when he says, from which arise envies, he describes the effect of error:
first, he mentions the effect;
second, he explains some things previously stated, at but godliness.
In regard to the first he does two things: first, he mentions the evils that follow false doctrine;
second, where these evils reside, at men corrupted in mind.
Among the evils he lists, some are within, in the heart; others are external.
Within are disorderly emotions in regard to good or in regard to evil. In regard to the good is sadness about someone else's good; hence he says, envies, which can be understood as referring either to the present case or to all cases; for when men labor not for the truth but only about words, they do not see with a balanced mind, if someone prevails: envy slays the little one (Job 5:2). In the present case, if servants regard themselves as free and not subject, their masters grow envious and bewail the fact that their servants are equal to them. As a result of envy a man rises up against his neighbor of whom he is envious: and this is contentions: it is an honor for a man to separate himself from quarrels (Prov 20:3); or he rises up against God: and this is blasphemies: blaspheming the things which they know not (2 Pet 2:12).
In regard to evil there is suspicion; hence he says, evil suspicions, namely, on the part of masters toward Christians, as though for gain we pretended that they were free: and suspicion of them has deceived many, and has detained their minds in vanity (Sir 3:26). As a result there issue conflicts of men against believers: there arose a strife between the herdsmen of Abram and of Lot (Gen 13:7).
Přeložit pomocí Googlu